> Forest of True Sight > Questions & Answers Reload this Page Can Anet implement and/or read Sardelac Sanitarium ideas and suggestions?
Closed Thread
Old Mar 26, 2011, 06:14 PM // 18:14   #1
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default Can Anet implement and/or read Sardelac Sanitarium ideas and suggestions?

Can Anet implement and/or read Sardelac Sanitarium ideas and suggestions? (please provide proof)
melissa b is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 06:23 PM // 18:23   #2
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Guild: Shadowed Ones
Profession: E/A
Default

Of course they can.. do you think it's illegal for them to do it or something? The question is not if they can but if they do. I think it's not too unlikely that the few Anet staff read popular threads on here. I think it's not too unlikely that that Anet use this forum and others to gauge reactions to new updates and stuff too. But obviously they don't have the time to implement every idea from there, even if no one is against it.

Firstly, they have lots of other things to do like WoC etc. Secondly, I think a lot of the worthy ideas they have probably already thought of long ago.
Cool Name is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 06:33 PM // 18:33   #3
Grotto Attendant
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: A little chalet outside Drok's
Guild: Natural Born Killaz
Default

A-Net has implemented many ideas found in Sardelac Sanitarium. The 7-hero party system? A suggestion from SS. Log-in with the option to select your status (online, offline, etc.) - Another SS suggestion. The ability to change your attribute points without any restrictions? Yes, that too was the result of a suggestion to fix a horrible system way back when.

Just because they don't implement every idea people post in Sardelac doesn't mean they don't look them over. There are a LOT of suggestions that are simply BAD and I thank God that they never see the light of day in-game.

As a side-note: I applaud A-Net's discretion in not commenting on suggestions found there.
Kook~NBK~ is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 06:38 PM // 18:38   #4
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Guild: Shadowed Ones
Profession: E/A
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kook~NBK~ View Post
A-Net has implemented many ideas found in Sardelac Sanitarium. The 7-hero party system? A suggestion from SS. Log-in with the option to select your status (online, offline, etc.) - Another SS suggestion. The ability to change your attribute points without any restrictions? Yes, that too was the result of a suggestion to fix a horrible system way back when.

Just because they don't implement every idea people post in Sardelac doesn't mean they don't look them over. There are a LOT of suggestions that are simply BAD and I thank God that they never see the light of day in-game.

As a side-note: I applaud A-Net's discretion in not commenting on suggestions found there.
Yes they were suggestions found there, but they were also blatantly obvious suggestions, so I don't know if it's because they were posted there that they were done.
Cool Name is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 07:00 PM // 19:00   #5
Never Too Old
 
Darcy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Rhode Island where there are no GW contests
Guild: Order of First
Profession: W/R
Default

Also, don't forget that guru did not start out as the largest GW forum. It had plenty of competition, including non-english-language forums. Then there was in-game chat which could be viewed by any ArenaNet employee who cared to hang around the most popular towns and outposts or even review the logs.

Obviously, I am a big fan of guru forums, but I don't believe we are the center of the GW universe.

Currently there is also the wiki Feedback pages for the purpose of suggestions.
http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Feedb...me_suggestions

Last edited by Darcy; Mar 26, 2011 at 07:10 PM // 19:10..
Darcy is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 08:31 PM // 20:31   #6
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Thanks for the response so far. Now I want to provide additional background information and why I asked this question and why I asked for proof...

First some qoutes from people that I would appreciate a response to.

Guru Member Named Bright Star Shine "Actually, Anet can't view Sardelac for some legal reasons.. Something to do with them being able to steal ideas you post or something like that (or at least, that's what I've been told)." this qoute is from post # 138 from this link... http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/p...0474105p7.html

Guru Member Named Marty Silverblade "I've seen a source of this, though I can't find it (and I don't care to spend much time looking either). It's to do with stealing intellectual property. If Anet say they read Sardelac, then implement one of the ideas, then they've taken something that doesn't belong to them. Thus, they don't read Sardelac. If you want Anet to implement ideas, you'll need to post them somewhere where it's clear that you forfeit claims to them." this qoute is from post #140 from the same link as previous qoute

Guru Member Named Bellatrixa "Also I believe there was a comment somewhere about ANet staff not being able to use ideas from Sardelac due to intellectual property laws etc?" this qoute is from post # 13 from this link.... http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...t10475490.html

So to be perfectly clear, my question is NOT does anet use ideas posted in Sardelac?

My question IS can they use ideas and can they read Sardelac? Additionally, can you provide any proof?

Last edited by melissa b; Mar 26, 2011 at 08:34 PM // 20:34..
melissa b is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 09:32 PM // 21:32   #7
Administrator
 
Marty Silverblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

I've found this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Guild_Wars_Wiki:Terms_of_Use
Contributions, Licenses & Assignments

Each contributor to the Official Guild Wars Wiki represents that the contributor???s contribution is original and does not infringe upon the intellectual property rights of any third party, and the contributor agrees to license or assign it as follows:

The contributor agrees to license the contributor???s contribution pursuant to the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) 1.2 or any later version (the ???GFDL???), except to the extent that the contributor posts the contribution within or to the Feedback Namespace of the Official Guild Wars Wiki. If your contribution is posted within or to the Feedback Namespace, you hereby assign all right, title, and interest, including without limitation all intellectual property rights, to that contribution to ArenaNet, Inc. and its successors and assigns (collectively ???ArenaNet???) and it shall be deemed the property of ArenaNet. (This enables ArenaNet to use such contributions in its games.) For contributions posted within or to the Feedback Namespace, ArenaNet grants a nonexclusive license to the contribution back to the Official Guild Wars Wiki users pursuant to the GFDL.

Contributors to the Official Guild Wars Wiki may also post content obtained from Guild Wars, its websites, manuals and guides, concept art and renderings, press and fansite kits, and other such copyrighted material that ArenaNet has made available to the general public, to the Official Guild Wars Wiki. Such content is not licensed pursuant to the GFDL and all right, title and interest in and to such content and contributions posted within or to the Feedback Namespace shall remain with ArenaNet and/or NCsoft, as applicable.

By using the Official Guild Wars Wiki, each contributor agrees that any contribution the contributor makes is provided voluntarily and freely with no right to or expectation of content preservation or compensation from ArenaNet or NCsoft. None of ArenaNet or NCsoft, or any of their respective employees, agents or representatives, is responsible if any contributor should change, edit, modify, or remove any information that a contributor has posted on the Official Guild Wars Wiki.
It talks about intellectual property and people forfeiting the claim to it. Thus, it implies that things outside of the designated areas would not be usable by Anet.
__________________
Marty Silverblade is0  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 09:39 PM // 21:39   #8
Furnace Stoker
 
MisterB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Planet Earth, Sol system, Milky Way galaxy
Guild: [ban]
Profession: W/
Default

http://www.guildwars2guru.com/forum/...5&postcount=19

There may have been posts or threads on this forum, too. Feel free to use the search function. I know there was an announcement thread at one point.
MisterB is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 09:41 PM // 21:41   #9
Desert Nomad
 
Black Metal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Profession: N/
Default

reconnects

probably the best feature Anet implemented, this one is huge

keep in mind, though, the majority of suggestions are horribad
Black Metal is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2011, 10:47 PM // 22:47   #10
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterB View Post
http://www.guildwars2guru.com/forum/...5&postcount=19

There may have been posts or threads on this forum, too. Feel free to use the search function. I know there was an announcement thread at one point.
Well, this link seems to prove that anything posted on Sardelec can't be considered by Anet. Hmmm, so only ideas on wiki feedback can be used, slightly disheartening.

I guess I'll post in Sardelac to finetune an idea and gauge popularity then post on wiki feedback.

Also, it looks like they would want to avoid even read Sardelac or they could risk someone saying they got the idea there.

Thanks for the link with proof, btw.
melissa b is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2011, 01:14 AM // 01:14   #11
Moderator
 
Kamatsu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Default

As the question asked has been answered, and there's no real room for discussion on this matter.. and this isn't the forum for discussing these issues anyways..

Thread Closed.
__________________
Have a moderation related issue or just want to chat? Send me a PM
Kamatsu is offline  
Closed Thread


Share This Forum!  
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:52 PM // 23:52.